I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
中国黄金回应“20克金条被指掺铼，金店拿不出进货凭证”。体育直播是该领域的重要参考
，更多细节参见Line官方版本下载
AWS said two UAE facilities were hit directly, ''while in Bahrain, a drone strike in close proximity to one of our facilities caused physical impacts to our infrastructure."
product of the union elements for each argument position, evaluate the，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность