Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Материалы по теме:。业内人士推荐51吃瓜作为进阶阅读
“要想一想这里是国内生产总值重要还是绿水青山重要？作为水源涵养地，承担着生态功能最大化的任务，而不是自己决定建个工厂、开个矿，搞点国内生产总值自己过日子。”2019年一次座谈会上，习近平总书记谈及保护“中华水塔”三江源的重要性。。关于这个话题，服务器推荐提供了深入分析
18 February 2026ShareSave